Data provenance
We consider where a resource originates, who contributed to it, the circumstances of its collection, and the permissions that govern its use.
How we approach data provenance, research integrity, reproducibility, and responsible use of African speech and language resources.
Explore our approachThe origins, composition, preparation, and permitted uses of a dataset shape what researchers can learn from it. These considerations are part of our work in African speech and language technology.
We consider where a resource originates, who contributed to it, the circumstances of its collection, and the permissions that govern its use.
We distinguish measured results from assumptions, document relevant methods, and account for limitations when interpreting research findings.
We value research records that explain how data was prepared, how experiments were conducted, and how evaluation results were obtained.
We consider the linguistic and social context of African language resources, including dialect variation, recording conditions, and gaps in coverage.
Data decisions influence every stage of model development. Our approach considers a resource's origins, the transformations it undergoes, the evidence it supports, and the conditions under which it can be shared.
We examine a resource's origin, collection context, intended use, and applicable permissions.
We account for processing, filtering, transcription, labelling, and other transformations that shape the resulting data.
We consider whether the data and evaluation methods fit the research question and support the conclusions being drawn.
We consider coverage gaps, uncertainty, data quality, and the conditions under which the results were obtained.
We value records of methods, resource changes, corrections, and findings that help make research understandable.
We consider permissions, privacy, attribution, and foreseeable risks when determining whether and how a resource can be shared.
Research records help explain how a resource was created, how an experiment was conducted, and where the evidence supports or limits a conclusion.
Sources, collection context, intended purpose, composition, applicable terms, and known limitations.
Preparation methods, filtering, normalisation, transcription, annotation decisions, and material transformations.
Relevant configurations, evaluation design, metrics, test conditions, and the evidence behind reported results.
Contributions, attribution requirements, reuse conditions, known errors, and changes that affect interpretation.
A dataset reflects the people, language varieties, collection conditions, and annotation decisions behind it. These factors shape how a model performs and how far research findings can reasonably be generalised.
We consider applicable permissions, privacy, attribution, research value, and foreseeable risks when deciding whether and how a resource can be shared.
Suitable for public sharing
Resources whose permissions and applicable conditions allow public release, with appropriate documentation and attribution.
Access with conditions
Resources whose legitimate use depends on additional permissions, access restrictions, or conditions on reuse.
Not suitable for public release
Resources that cannot responsibly be shared when permissions are absent or unclear, or when relevant risks remain unresolved.
We distinguish demonstrated findings from hypotheses, recognise the contributions behind research resources, and account for relevant limitations when interpreting results.
Benchmark scores and successful demonstrations provide evidence under particular conditions. They do not, on their own, establish performance across every African language, dialect, speaker group, or real-world setting.
For questions about a research resource, its provenance, permissions, or appropriate use, contact Sauti Labs through the contact channel published on our website. Include the relevant resource and a description of your question without sending unnecessary personal or sensitive information.